Forgot your password?
EU Not Changing Its Stand On Nepal’s Constitution
EU Not Changing Its Stand On Nepal’s Constitution
KTM Metro Reporter
Kathmandu, April 6, 2016: At the meeting with the Deputy Prime Minster holding the portfolio of the foreign ministry Kamal Thapa, the EU ambassador to Nepal simply repeated that the EU stood by the previous India-EU joint statement issued for calling on Nepal to have an inclusive constitution, according to the Radio Nepal morning news of today. It indicated how ignorant EU officials including the diplomat had been of poking nose into others business was not the right thing to do even if it was not an unwholesome act.
Nepal is the land of Buddha; Nepalese had the compassion for those ignorant EU officials and would forgive them for what they had done unknowingly but Nepal had been very concerned with the EU not having the compassion for the Syrian refugees that had fled their country for their lives, the EU had been forcibly ejecting them from the EU member countries sending them to the death trap. That was again the EU officials had been doing because of the ignorance that they needed not commit such an inhuman act.
The EU officials also needed to be very concerned with the inhuman treatment of some Indian women who were denied access to the Hindu temple reserving it absolutely for the men only but Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had simply ignored such brutal treatment of the women in the Hindu temple in India. Again the EU officials had no humanitarian concern for the Indian women suffering from the religious discrimination not to the mention the heinous treatment of Syrian refugees in the EU member countries.
EU countries needed to learn that they needed to honor the sovereignty of other countries no matter how small they were if the EU itself wanted to keep its own sovereignty. Ignoring such serious concern for others, the EU had shown its immaturity in the international diplomacy, and also had shown that the EU had grossly violated the UN charter of not interfering in the affairs of other countries.
EU needed to abstain from following the third country’s policy in the case of Nepal that of India to bully the tiny country. EU also needed to understand that India wanted to lead Japan to the trap currently EU had fallen but Japan refused to do so what EU had done to Nepal following the tactics of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
EU surely would not benefit bullying the small country like Nepal that had stoop up to the might imperial State that India could not for centuries, and remained under the shadow of the British Empire. Nepal would stand up to the challenge posed by the India-EU joint misadventure. Certainly, EU also had suffered from the moral hazard as India did poking nose into the internal affairs of Nepal.
EU needed to understand that the leaders that had been rejected on the general elections had been protesting against the Nepalese constitution passed by the 90% of the constituent assembly members only to keep they not drowning in the political waves brought by the adoption of a new constitution.
Surely, EU could benefit pleasing India because India was a large country. It could have a large business interest but Nepal was a tiny country that could not give anything at the current status but also asking for something from every donor country being a beggar country. EU needed not forget that India had clearly bought the EU officials at a price. Nepal had not so much resources to buy such high value EU officials. Consequently, Nepal had to suffer from the bully of those so-called EU officials
However, EU needed to understand that Nepal had not done any discrimination against its underprivileged people as India had been doing so far. EU needed not ignore Indian State Maharastra denying millions of non-Hindus eating beef had violated the fundamental human rights to eat the most nutritious food but Modi simply did not talk about it not to mention protecting the rights of the minority people from discrimination because Modi himself was the staunch supporter of doing anything possible against anybody other than Hindu. If EU officials ignored all these things meant they were sold to Indian Prime Minister Modi. What could be more than that?
